I removed the old hosting project named jones1. I downloaded five SwissTransfer zip files of the El Paseo design and put them in the jones2 folder. I deployed an exact copy to elpaseo.jonesagency.dev. All 240 of 240 files matched the original exactly.
The first responsive check measured 1 pass of 12 devices. 7 WebKit iPhone devices did not load the page. I then rewrote the site to work on mobile devices. I also upgraded the check from 12 devices to 34 devices across three browser engines. The new check found a real defect in iOS that the old check did not find.
SESSION OPENThe user gave five instructions: remove the old host, download the files, deploy the copy, check the links, and check the mobile layout. I traced the old host to jones1.toolforge.ai. This host shared one Cloudflare Pages project with elpaseo.jonesagency.dev. The user chose to delete the whole project, not just the hostname.
I downloaded five SwissTransfer zip files through the Chrome browser session and put them in the jones2/extract folder. All five files were identical, 239 files each. The link check found one broken link, to a file named "El Paseo Shopping.dc.html", which does not exist.
I built the deploy tree with a script named build_site.py. It made a byte-verified copy and repaired the broken link in place, per the user's instruction. I created a new Cloudflare Pages project named jones2 and deployed 240 files. The byte check found all files clean. It found one addition to every HTML file, from Cloudflare Web Analytics. This addition is normal at the domain zone level, not a defect.
The domain elpaseo.jonesagency.dev now points to jones2. I deleted the old project, jones1, and confirmed it returns 404 with no leftover DNS record. The first run of the existing 12-device check measured 21 passes of 60 page-and-device combinations. I committed the work and pushed it.
The user then asked me to do three things: remove files not needed for the deliverable, remove the 4-hour cache, and fix the mobile display. I found the cause of the sideways scroll: two decorative panels set at a fixed 648-pixel width. I found the cause of the WebKit load failure: a paragraph with a fixed pixel size, combined with a forced line break in the introduction heading. I fixed both without changes to the desktop layout. The 12-device check then measured 60 passes of 60.
The user then asked for the check to meet an industry standard, with no gaps. I expanded the device matrix from 12 to 34 configs, across three browser engines: WebKit, Chromium, and Firefox. I added 12 new usability rules, each proved first on a bad example, then on a good example. The new check found a real defect, a zoom problem on an iOS input field, that the old check could not find. I fixed the defect. The final full check run, across all five pages, was still in progress when this record closed.
This section lists eight fixes. I named and defined each fix in port_site.py before I changed any code. I set one rule for all eight fixes: the check named responsive_audit.py --strict must report zero critical items on every page, and the desktop view must not change. I proved the desktop view was unchanged with a separate tool, visual_compare.py. It made 21 before-and-after screenshots, stored in jones2/_visual_v3.
The table below shows one page at a time. The number of device-configs for one page grew from 12 to 34 as I upgraded the check. This is a different count from the 21-of-60 and 60-of-60 figures above. Those figures cover all five pages together on the original 12-device check. Read the two tables side by side. Do not add the two counts together.
I ran this check on the live site, which still serves the literal copy. The port is not yet live. See the alert below.